Trint Review: Best for turning research into video content

avatar

Mina Lopez

Trint uses AI transcription to turn audio and video files into text. It’s a great choice if you use video content to showcase your research findings. Many of Trint’s features are geared towards content creators, with its ability to capture and transcribe audio content in real-time and pull quotes from multiple transcripts to create articles, podcasts, and scripts.

However, these features are also helpful for any professional interested in creating content directly from their research or interviews. The tool is used by publications like The Washington Post.

All the transcripts stored in Trint are searchable, editable, and kept in a collaborative doc form that makes it easy to share with your team. Plus, Trint’s editing tools allow you to highlight key quotes from your transcripts.

You can pause your subscription at any time if you don’t need to transcribe interviews that month. But note that you’ll be charged a $5 fee for each paused month in return for the platform securely storing your files.

Key Features

  • Real-time AI transcription
  • ISO-certified security for enterprise-grade protection
  • Collaborative transcript editing and sharing
  • Quote-pulling and script generation tools
  • Editing interface compatible with Adobe Premiere
  • Searchable transcript archives
  • Closed caption generation

Compatibility

  • Browser-based
  • iOS
  • Android

Pricing

  • Starter: $80/month/user – Ideal for individuals needing basic transcription
  • Advanced: $100/month/user – Includes editing, captioning, and collaboration features
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing with enhanced security and support

Supported Languages

  • 46+ languages, including: Arabic, English, Japanese, Korean, Dutch, Danish, Mandarin Chinese, Spanish, and more

Pros

  • High accuracy, even with muffled or unclear audio
  • Speaker identification works well in multi-speaker recordings
  • Flexible playback speed for easier review and editing
  • Ability to generate publish-ready scripts

Cons

  • Expensive compared to other solutions
  • Editing UI can be slightly unintuitive for first-time users
  • Charges $5/month even when subscription is paused